Talk:Beauséjour, Marne
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
BART:
1. There were a lot of villages destroyed in WWI, not just at Verdun. The lack of current linkages doesn't mean this category isn't needed. Rather, it means there's more work to do.
2. Part of the Wikipedia philosophy is to build a little more each day...sometimes we add on to what is already started, sometimes we start something new. You shouldn't destroy a reasonable category just because its in its infancy. Give the baby a chance to develop first. → R Young {yakłtalk} 17:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- But you really should create that particular category first before adding it to whatever article, Robert. Extremely sexy 20:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- This is correct - sure, create new relevant categories, but don't populate them until they exist! This helps to prevent someone making up one name for a particular category, someone else making up another name and another person making up a third name for the same category. And red links in category sections look rubbish! Mr WR 13:25, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Why was this moved from "France" to Marne? Any reason for this name change?→ R Young {yakłtalk} 08:59, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Because the Marne category is a much sharper sub-sub-sub-subcategory of the France category Mr WR 13:25, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Also, some have claimed that 'all' villages that were destroyed in France in WWI were at the Somme. In fact, that is not true. It would be helpful if someone could better link this and all the other 'orphaned' village articles out there.→ R Young {yakłtalk} 18:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Beauséjour, Marne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060320155810/http://crdp.ac-reims.fr/memoire/lieux/1GM_CA/villages_detruits/beausejour.htm to http://crdp.ac-reims.fr/memoire/lieux/1GM_CA/villages_detruits/beausejour.htm
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130213141132/http://www.crdp-reims.fr/memoire/lieux/1GM_CA/villages_detruits/beausejour.htm to http://www.crdp-reims.fr/memoire/lieux/1GM_CA/villages_detruits/beausejour.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 23 December 2017 (UTC)