Talk:Beecham's Pills
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Effectiveness
[edit]The Beechams accumulated a vast fortune. Were the pills placebo junk, or did they have a genuine theraputic effect for the ailments claimed (I seem to remember they were referred to a Beecham's Liver Pills for billiousness (whatever that is - strange how illnesses have fashions)? The ingredients seem pretty innoccuous and the theraputic effect, though noted, is not explained. I am left with the impression this was (very successful) quack medecine.
217.39.9.244 (talk) 19:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ah - I see; I knew there must be more to it - they were known as an abortifacient, and advertised (as far as could be done) as such.
See http://www.glowm.com/?p=glowm.cml/section_view&articleid=375#r40
"The history of Beecham's Pills in the United Kingdom involves the spread of a drug perceived to be an abortifacient. An 1897 advertisement in the Queen Victoria Diamond Jubilee Number of the Christian Herald is typical: “Worth a guinea a box. Beecham's Pills for all bilious and nervous disorders such as Sick Headache, Constipation, Weak Stomach, Impaired Digestion, Disordered Liver and Female Ailments. The sale is now 6 million boxes per annum.” This advertising copy was frequently printed with a picture of a young woman walking along the seashore or saying goodbye to a sailor boyfriend and was captioned, “What are the wild waves saying? Try Beecham's Pills.
Refs:Potts M, Diggory P, Peel T: Abortion. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1977 and Davis G: Interception of Pregnancy. Sydney, Australia, Angus and Robertson, 1974" 109.144.243.176 (talk) 09:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beecham's Pills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514143603/http://www.gsk.com/about/history.htm to http://www.gsk.com/about/history.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)