Jump to content

Talk:Beit Wazan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DYK?

[edit]

@Al Ameer son: Shall we nominate this for DYK? Huldra (talk) 22:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Huldra: Already did. It's packaged with Qasim al-Ahmad. --Al Ameer (talk) 01:20, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Al Ameer son: Great, I did not see that. I wonder though, should we divide it into the same sections as used in the last West Bank DYK, Burqin? Then I could add all the 1945 data, not only the population. I could add the 1961 data, too. Huldra (talk) 20:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Normally, I think any modern-era population stats should be included in a Demographics section. However, go ahead and add any other data you have for 1945 and 1961 into the "Modern era" subsection for "History". I'll organize it accordingly. --Al Ameer (talk) 21:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What about arranging it in like in Burqin, with a British Mandate era, Jordanian, and Israeli (post-1967)-sections? Huldra (talk) 21:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I don't support the set-up in Burqin because the content in each of those subsections is much too small to warrant a separate heading. The British, Jordanian and Israeli periods are all unique eras, but ultimately the volume of material should determine whether or not each of those eras gets their own section. In Burqin, for example, the Israeli and Jordanian periods only have two sentences general to the entire West Bank between them. If and when the material we have on these eras is fleshed out (i.e. a full passage or two), then I would support creating more specific subsections. Until then, I think "Modern era" or "Contemporary period" would be more suitable.--Al Ameer (talk) 23:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beit Wazan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]