Talk:Belvedere Vodka

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV/COI[edit]

Like most WP articles on kiddie nightclub drinks, this stinks of company PR. I don't know why they bother, as few of their potential customers are going to check out WP before going out to get hammered. --Ef80 (talk) 01:31, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I've restored it to an older, less objectionable version and cleaned up a little. Looking at the history of the article, this is a long-term problem, and the article has been see-sawing back and forth between short-and-acceptable and bloated-press-release for years now. If (or when) this happens again, a post at WP:COIN to get more experienced eyes on the problem might be a good idea. Grayfell (talk) 08:35, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it does happen again, please do alert me so I can chime in at WP:COIN if required. AdventurousMe (talk) 11:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance[edit]

Re "Criticism," suggest that this short-lived (45 min.) piece of adv. poor judgment three years ago is no longer relevant. Sca (talk) 16:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was a little more substantial than the paragraph implied. The ad used a screen capture from a video, apparently without getting permission from the people involved. One of the actors in the ad, Alicyn Packard, filed a lawsuit against the company for violating the California Celebrities Rights Act. I've expanded the section to explain that. It was covered by multiple reliable source, and had a somewhat substantial impact, so I think it should stay. Grayfell (talk) 23:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for the reply. Sca (talk) 14:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belvedere (vodka). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]