A fact from Ben Collins (reporter) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 August 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
it meets the criteria at WP:RS. If you disagree, wait for consensus here. Sundayclose (talk) 00:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which criteria? There's no evidence that Rising has any editorial oversight. For all I care, it should be treated the same way we treat Fox News talk shows. 93.72.49.123 (talk) 00:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Again, read WP:ONUS: content that is disputed stays out until there is consensus for its inclusion. 93.72.49.123 (talk) 00:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also not seeing it. I'm grateful that we don't typically include criticism sourced only to morning news opinion shows, and I don't believe there's a compelling reason to do so here. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apropos your disruptive revert of my edit today: What part of WP:THEHILL do you not understand? You're attempting to override the consensus documented there.--RudolfoMD (talk) 02:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a Hill news piece, it's an opinion shared on a morning news talk show. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's in a Hill publication. If you want to dispute the finding that it's generally reliable, etc, bring it up at RS/N. --RudolfoMD (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Am I reading consensus wrong here? I'm seeing more opposition than support, and I'd have to stretch to see something more than "no consensus". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 20:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see more support - prior consensus from RSN, User:Sundayclose and I and recent input you received at WP:RSN ALL say that it's a reliable source. But the article currently reflects edit warring against that consensus. As far as DUE, we seem to be at loggerheads. I think it's necessary for the reader to understand why Ben Collins was suspended. Right now they can't. How do we fix that? Additionally, it's rare for a news reporter to be called out in the media for mis-reporting. Furthermore, when it happens, the reason it's generally notable is that it serves an important self-policing function.
Also, the article has been incorrected* to indicate that Collins attacked Matt Taibbi's reporting, when he actually attacked Matt Taibbi (ad hominem). *is that a word? If not, should be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RudolfoMD (talk • contribs) 09:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia warns that the Walter Cronkite Award for Excellence in Journalism is "Not to be confused with the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism's Walter Cronkite Award for Excellence in Television Political Journalism." but editors have confused them. --RudolfoMD (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll admit that I had been confused when making this. My apologies. — Red-tailed hawk(nest) 19:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm reading through sources on the Collins suspension, and they don't seem to indicate that something Twitter Files-related was the cause. (See, for example [2]). I've removed some material that may have been taken to imply that his criticism of Taibbi was the cause for the suspension. — Red-tailed sock(Red-tailed hawk's nest) 16:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]