Talk:Berkshire No. 7/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 01:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review it.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 01:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Three questions:

Since this is a ship/barge, shouldn't this barge have an infobox like the other ones?

I'm not good with that at all! I think I could figure it out if you want. I'm not too familiar with ship article infoboxes. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Figured it out for you.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 04:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A picture of any kind would be nice.

Gonna be tough, the NRHP has a photo of it afloat, but its really terrible and its not able to be used due to Wikipedia's image policies. Because its not CC-by-SA or public domain. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 1's accessdate is inconsistent with other refs.

An aberration with the NHRP template used on all NHRP infoboxes. The database however, is correct and this can be verified at any time by accessing it. I can replace it with a manual duplicate, but the template for the citation doesn't seem to have a manual access-date to change. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks great!—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 01:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm going to pass it. Remember to fix the infoboxes for the other two ships.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 22:08, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]