Talk:Berkshire bus routes 701, 702 and 703

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 16 June 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved. The result of the discussion was moved to Berkshire bus routes 702 and 703.

Requested move 16 June 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Berkshire bus routes 702 and 703. WP:BARTENDER. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 21:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Green Line bus routes 702 and 703 → ? – London Line route 702 and Flight Line route 703 are long mouthfuls for a bus route article, I feel, so I'm not sure what to rename this article as a result. As a former Green Line route, it has notability, but what would we now call this article following the June 2023 rebranding? Hullian111 (talk) 07:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could the article be split into two, one for 702 and one for 703? Garuda3 (talk) 08:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not overly hot on that idea, to be honest, especially in the case of route 703. Unless something can be written up on the history of route 702 under First and predecessors, it feels like they'd both turn out as very short stub articles. And since the 703 seems like a variant of the 702, it might be best to keep both together. Hullian111 (talk) 10:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move to London Line bus route 702 and Flight Line bus route 703 why not? In ictu oculi (talk) 13:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any MOS policy against it, but it feels pretty clunky and a bit of a mouthful to put in a title that long for a bus route. The Berkshire idea suggested below might be a good idea instead? Hullian111 (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though would 'Berkshire bus routes 702 and 703' work? Grandtubetrains (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That could be a good neutral option to go down. Let's see where community consensus goes on the issue, though. Hullian111 (talk) 10:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, splitting as Berkshire bus route 702 and Berkshire bus route 703, London Line bus route 702 and Flight Line bus route 703 is too cumbersome. Kermelei (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 04:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.