Talk:Bernard Foing/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Adavis444 (talk) 09:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC) From the Wikipedia:Good article criteria, GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
As Adavis444 has not implemented a review, despite a reminder on their talk page, i am taking over this review. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:28, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: No dabs found.
Linkrot: No dead links found. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- References appear OK, but few mention him in more than passing as an author.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- As a biography, this is not at all broad in its coverage, the article is primarily about projects that Foing has been involved in. As a BLP it is still stub class.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Non free images must not be used in the infobox or lead for BLPs, as per WP:Fair use#Images
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I am failing this nomination at the present time as I feel that the article is not sufficiently broad in its coverage. The points about the lead and the non-free image also need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:30, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: