Jump to content

Talk:Bernard Gavrin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


What about the other two US bodies?

[edit]

The article mentions that the Kuentai Group "found three dog tags belonging to American soldiers". What about the other two Americans? Was Gavrin the only one identified? Were the other two soldiers buried as unknowns? Manxruler (talk) 16:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Over-referencing

[edit]

I've just removed some really excessive over-referencing from the article. Having multiple references for facts covered by one or two refs doesn't seem helpful. Nick-D (talk) 07:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The various article do differ some in their content. The point of all the references is for future expansion of the article by me or other editors. As you know, as time goes by, it becomes increasingly difficult to find sources. Over-referencing is only a possible issue if the purpose is overkill, but the purpose in this case is to have them there for future expansion. Note also that WP:OVERCITE is not policy. --I am One of Many (talk) 07:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'd suggest listing them as 'further reading' in that case (given that's what they are). I think that having lots of references for simple statements makes the infomation cited look of questionable accuracy or controversial, and doesn't do readers any favours. Nick-D (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]