Talk:Bernard Schriever/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 03:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Images properly licensed
- External links OK and no DABs
- He remained behind as chief of the maintenance and engineering division of the Fifth Air Force Service Command until the end of the war. Remained behind?
- Changed to "remained in Australia". Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- After the war, Schriever returned joined the United States Army Air Forces An extra word here?
- Deleted "returned" Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- USAF standardized the flying boom "on" the flying boom
- Corrected. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- The US military uses dmy date format
- Converted. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- 3,000 pounds (1,400 kg) nuclear warhead with use the adjectival form for the weight and "within"
- White reorganized then typo?
- Corrected. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Nicely done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. It wasn't intended as a major overhaul, but the original version was very poor, and largely unsourced. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Understood. I'd recommend that the date format be fixed before any ACR though.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. It wasn't intended as a major overhaul, but the original version was very poor, and largely unsourced. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)