Jump to content

Talk:Bert Monroy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reference added to assist in this endeavor. Bert has a significant background and the current article is not doing it justice. Merging it somewhere else would be a mistake. This article should be improved, not merged. Jimerb (talk) 05:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bert Monroy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template Blanking

[edit]

Hello @ZRostomian: please do not blank templates like you have done without discussion here at the talk page. I have reverted your unconstructive edits for a second time. I also welcome you to make any WP:COI declaration for yourself here on the talk page, or on your userpage, given that a cursory Google search for this name indicates it is highly likely that you are associated with the article subject. You will note that I removed the WP:Notability flag from the article, as he was an early Photoshop expert. But I left the COI flag, as it has been edited by the subject. The main problem at this point, is that there are no WP:RS reliable sources to back up any of the claims on the article. --Theredproject (talk) 13:05, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]