Jump to content

Talk:Bessas (magister militum)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 05:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this this weekend.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    This is awkward: active especially under Justinian I Perhaps, "primarily active under Justinian I"? Who are Gadar and Yazdegerd? Are they notable? This is also awkward: Nothing more is heard of him Perhaps "Nothing more is known about him"?
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Hello Sturmvogel and thanks for the review! I've implemented the suggested changes. Cheers, Constantine 09:59, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]