Talk:Best Of (RBD album)

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Best Of (RBD album)#Hits em Português|Hits Em Português]] The anchor (#Hits em Português) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Too many covers

For years now, Wikipedia has not accepted per-release covers in discography type articles. Whether we call articles such as this discographies or not is really beside the point. Please identify the most representative album cover and reduce the use of non-free images to that one image. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I don't have a clear opinion in this case, I thought maybe some people at WP:ALBUM may, as it seems related to previous discussions (I'm not saying it is the same, just that I see a relation), so I invited them to comment. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 22:16, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a particular album, it's not a discography. That is relevant. Current guidelines call for discographies to mostly exclude album covers, but album covers are fine for album articles. How many different album cover images an album article can have is a bit more of a gray area. This article currently has five, which sounds like a lot, but the covers are for releases in different countries, and three of them are totally different from each other. I'd say allow all five, or at least three really different ones. — Mudwater^(Talk) 02:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping in... I say ditch the video covers. They're nearly identical to the CD covers of their respective releases (only real difference is vertical size), so they don't pass NFCC in my opinion. I also don't think you really need 5 infoboxes here; just 1 at the top of the article for the original release (probably the one in their home country?). The release dates etc. for the other versions can simply be stated in prose and the covers put alongside the prose like standard images. The presence of 5 infoboxes is superfluous. --IllaZilla (talk) 07:25, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the covers. If you disagree with this, you can plead your case at WT:NFC, but I can assure you the covers being used here will not be supported. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No one really cares. Per your original suggestion, I left the first image as "the most representative". --Muhandes (talk) 22:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]