Talk:Better Living Through Chemistry

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Drug Policy (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy articles

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Polymers (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers articles

Popular Culture (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular Culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular CultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular CulturePopular Culture articles

Another modern useage?[edit]

I've also heard this used in reference to non-illegal drugs, notably psychopharmaceuticals, anyone know where a reference might be? Wintermut3 10:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The UK based BLTC. I and others used it for info on Stablon, since there is a lack of otherwise easily accessible material about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.74.131.101 (talk) 05:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do I recall such a reference in the movie "The Graduate"? I'm not sure.

The reference to Agent Orange is wrong. Just plain wrong. Dow was protested because of napalm. I'll wait one week before fixing it myself.173.57.26.9 (talk) 02:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the Agent Orange reference even here? What has it to do with a DuPont slogan? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.55.236.190 (talk) 04:43, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal: restore pop culture references[edit]

I think that this list of pop culture references, removed last year, was interesting, informative, and encyclopedic. We do the same thing for numbers, years, etc, without requiring a cited source to make the obvious connection. An expanded discussion of the original slogan is in order, as well.groupuscule (talk) 03:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Better Living Through Chemistry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150601024918/http://www.leadpipeposters.com/detail.cfm?stockno=342 to http://www.leadpipeposters.com/detail.cfm?stockno=342

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BLTC Commercial Website link?[edit]

There is an external link to a dot com called BLTC. In my opinion, that site has nothing to do with Chemistry or Better Living Through Chemistry. I don't even see much real science on that site, just new-age mumbo jumbo. Although it has taken the name BLTC, I think that that External Link should be removed as being irrelevant to the actual topic and meaning of BLTC. Update: The link appears to have been added on 15:58, 25 September 2009 by 74.94.105.238 . AdderUser (talk) 00:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Paradoctor (talk) 19:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]