This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beverley Aerodrome article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Beverley Aerodrome is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
B class. Possible typo: In the second-to-last paragraph under History, this is written: "No.s 78 and 79". Shouldn't it be "Nos. 78 and 79"? If so, then please correct it. Djmaschek (talk) 19:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The joy of all things, I don't know if "No.s 78 and 79" is an English-English thing but in American-English it would be expressed "Nos. 78 and 79". Your edit is OK. You could also have done this: "No. 78 and No. 79". Whatever! The important thing is that the article is good for B class. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 22:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Djmaschek, agreed, it probably is a British English thing, which is why I changed it, to make it more readable for international viewers. Thanks for the assessment. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 08:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
