Talk:Bhagat Singh/GA2
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 14:47, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 14:59, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria[edit]
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Following Gandhi's withdrawal of the movement after the violent murders of policemen Could you rephrase this, the meaning is unclear. Did Gandhi withdraw from the movement? Or did he stop the campaign?He was 14 when, on February 20, 1921, the custodian of Nankana Sahib (the birthplace of Guru Nanak) and his men, fired on Akali Dal protesters. What did this have to do with the Young Revolutionary Movement?and became popular amongst the youth Which youth?
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
which had prominent leaders like "such as"
- '
' A year later, upon being pressurised by his family, "upon being pressurised"?
- '
- Suitably reworded to A year later, pressurised by his family who wanted him to get married. Rechecked usage of word pressurise from Oxford dictionary(#2, with the comment (also pressurise)). Tinpisa (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
after about five weeks of his arrest
- OK, the prose is nearly there but needs copy-editing throughout to improve the grammar which is somewhat lacking at the moment. When that has been done, I will look at prose and MoS again.
- Can we do something about the multiple use of the word "approvers". I have fixed two instances but it is clearly not good grammar.
- and issued an order intimating the accused missing preposition, "telling" would be better.
- Special Tribunal There is a lot of uneccessary repetion in this section. Please rewrite in a simpler summary style
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Sufficiently good coverage
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Stable
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images licensed and tagged, captions OK
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- On hold for seven days for a thorough copy-edit. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:13, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Failed due to extensive copyright violations. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.