Talk:Big Jock Knew

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Scotland Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Scottish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tabloids[edit]

I don't think we can use tabloid sources on this article. --John (talk) 08:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On what grounds? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPSOURCES. --John (talk) 09:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that covers Brazil but not Torbett since i don't think he is a lp. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your concerns, I have changed a few sources to non "tabloid" papers which under BLPSOURCES (which I'm not 100% sure applies here) which means that it can stand with that source alongside the ones currently used. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 11:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have no evidence that Torbett is dead; Brazil certainly isn't, so BLPSOURCES is definitely a concern. --John (talk) 11:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I took him out in response to the concerns. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 12:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --John (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be deleted?[edit]

I think this has be viewed and discussed on deleting this page.

Basically the whole page and accusations is from one source (number 4), the rest of the sources are just used to confirm people and names.

It is also a very one sided written piece, with one small sentence and no names mentioned in arguing against the claims meanwhile the rest is dedicated to trying to "prove" the claims, each with one source in hand.

This needs to be reviewed and either rewritten or removed. This is basically a propaganda piece used by the writer to push their views. Not what wikipedia is about. 88.203.102.64 (talk) 15:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have made several changes to this article to try and bring it to a normal standard which are being undone with no explanation.

There is clear opinion in this with no sources, we need sources to actually back up what is being said, this is very flimsy. 88.203.102.64 (talk) 23:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a wiki about the song or about James Torbett?[edit]

The mass majority of this wiki is about James Torbett and his trial and not about the song.

Clearly there isn't enough for a wiki about the song if it is just recycling info from the wiki where James Torbett is already documented and mentioned 185.124.126.195 (talk) 22:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Broken sources and info being "sited" but not in source[edit]

Changes have been made to remove broken sources and also remove info that was not shown in the given source.

Please stop changing this and either change to a correct working source and one that shows the info given.

You can't just add a random source and write whatever info you want, it has to be in the sited source. 185.124.126.195 (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]