Talk:Big Red Envelope

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 03:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the 2021 film Big Red Envelope is intended as a commentary on the changing role of red envelopes in Chinese society? Source: "红包本来是咱们中华民族一个很好的传统,就是人与人之间礼尚往来的一个情感的一个载体,但是现在频繁地送红包,人们的生活带来了沉重的压力,特别是上班族,所以说呢我们这个影片通过结婚送礼送红包的这个故事,来批判目前这样的一个社会现状。"[1]
    • ALT1:... that when Big Red Envelope was released, nearly half of its audience came from fourth-tier Chinese cities? Source: "Another ticketing vendor Maoyan, where it earned an 8.5 rating, showed that more than 45% of the film’s audience came from fourth tier cities."[2]

Created by Mx. Granger (talk). Self-nominated at 20:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article is long enough and new enough. A QPQ has been completed. Either hook is fine and they are directly cited. The fifth reference is a WordPress blog, but the reviewer Derek Elley is a notable film critic so that is fine. The cast section needs to be referenced. SL93 (talk) 21:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review – I've added a citation to Derek Elley's review for the cast section. Not sure whether it would be clearer to cite it at the end of each line or just once at the end of the section. —Granger (talk · contribs) 21:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine and it's easier. I do it the same way on film articles. SL93 (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]