Talk:Bill Oakley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBill Oakley has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 26, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Sources[edit]

  • [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
  • SLACKER COMEDY NEEDS TO WORK ON DEFINING ITS GOALS
  • New comedies coming to NBC
  • SHAKING UP BUSINESS
  • A LOOK AT THE NEW SERIES FROM ABC TO THE WB
  • That's Show Buzz - For the Guys Behind 'Mission Hill,' a Long, Hard Climb
  • COLLISION COURSE - WITH THE DIVISIVE OUSTER OF ITS HEADMASTER, ST. ALBANS IS NO LONGER SO VERY PRIVATE
  • From Harvard to Hollywood - Ivy Leaguers are now writing TV sitcoms

Laugh of the day![edit]

Ran into this article on GAN backlog. Found this gem (paraphrasing) "they could not find a job, any job, anywhere, and even considered joining the Foreign Service". Superb! (and I'm deadpan serious about it).

I really wanted to review it for GA (it's been a whole two months) but there's one thing that stops me: I don't understand The Simpsons. I'd rather review something that I've never seen (rather than a run-of-the-mill show of dull characters with deformed faces painted in acid colours... you name it). Oh well. But you'd better split the Simpsons section into something readable - two flat screens of text are hard on anyone's eyes.

Cheers, hope this article makes it to GA, East of Borschov 10:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bill Oakley/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. -- Cirt (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nomination on hold[edit]

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of October 6, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?:
  • Serious need of copyediting.
  • Lots of run-on sentences, and sentences that are too long, and generally way too much overusage of commas, commas where they are not needed and could just be removed, and commas in places where sentences should be broken up into two, or sometimes there, shorter, sentences.
  • The comment by East of Borschov (talk · contribs) is correct that the subsection The Simpsons could be broken up with two sub-subsections inside it.
  • Personal life - short paragraphs and two-sentence-long-paragraphs - these could be merged and/or better yet, expanded more.
2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout.
3. Broad in coverage?:
  • Early life - this section is a bit short, would be nice to see this expanded.
  • Personal life - this section is also a bit small, would be nice to see some additional secondary sources here.
4. Neutral point of view?: Neutrally worded and matter-of-fact throughout - though I did do some copyediting removing subtle issues.
5. Article stability? No stability issues upon inspection of talk page history and article edit history.
6. Images?:

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. -- Cirt (talk) 07:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. There is no other information avaliable so nothing can be expanded. I have no time to copy-edit at any point and a) disagree that there is a problem b) have no idea to try to 'fix' it anyway. Gran2 09:44, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps additional individuals other than yourself can search for more WP:RS secondary sources for info to expand those sects. Copyediting is also something that should be done by someone previously uninvolved with the article. Strongly recommend seeking copyediting help from WP:GOCE and posting to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects for copyediting help - and trying to get some research help from WP:BIOG and WP:DOH. Unfortunately, if none of the above issues are addressed, as stated in the GA Hold statement, the article will not be able to pass. -- Cirt (talk) 17:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A copyedit was done, so this can be reviewed again. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks much better, thanks for the notice. GA passed. -- Cirt (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Oakley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Bill Oakley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Oakley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bill_Oakley&oldid=1216546137"