Talk:Biodiversity of Cape Town

South Africa Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecology Mid‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Copy-edit notice

The "for" text in the original copy-edit tag said:

improper capitalization of species common names, other than where a name occurs or the first word of the begins a sentence or bullet list item; 2) don't number lists for no reason; 3) add scientific names for each species; 4) fix incomplete common names like "cupreous blue" (cuprious blue what?!); 5) remove redundant links (only link scientific name if common name is a redlink and in such cases it's better to move the sci. name to the common name anyway, except for plants.

Some of this is simply wrong.

It's arguable as to whether capitalizing English names in lists is wrong, especially when some of the groups normally have their English names capitalized (see below).
As far as I can tell there is always a scientific name for each species.
Cupreous Blue is the correct common name of a butterfly; "Blue" is a noun in butterfly names, which are normally capitalized (as per examples at Wikipedia:WikiProject Lepidoptera and WP:Insects#Names and titles).

Peter coxhead (talk) 21:22, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

improper capitalization of species common names – made consistent but not decapitalized.
don't number lists for no reason – Done
add scientific names for each species – they were already there.
fix incomplete common names like "cupreous blue" – they are correct.
remove redundant links – Done, always linked to the scientific name for consistency.

Copy-edit notice removed. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Biodiversity of Cape Town. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marine species

Is marine biodiversity within the scope of this article? If so, where does one draw the line. Does the "Cape Town" extend beyond the high-water mark? Beyond the low-water mark? · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 19:15, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictions

The content of section Endemism states that there is a list of endemic plants but the list that follows contains animals (which may be endemic). This cannot be fixed until it is clear what is intended. Sourcing is also unclear. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 03:33, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Town undefined

The geographical extent of Cape Town is undefined for this article, making it impossible to identify the correct scope of the contents. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 03:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The referencing is not good either; basically the same website at different dates. It's not clear how it was accessed, nor what its sources are. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additional species

What is this section intended to list? There is at least one duplicate, Erica verticillata Greenman (talk) 20:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]