Jump to content

Talk:Birkhäuser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I've undone the redirect because it is wrong. There are two Birkhäusers currently operating. One by Springer and one by ACTAR. And they have little to do with each other. The article on Birkhäuser Verlag only describes how ACTAR got dibs to the Birkhäuser name, but says nothing about what Springer's Birkhäuser is doing (and they publish quite a few scient/math book series.) Instead Birkhäuser Verlag only describes the landscaping/architecture stuff (which was actually a minor part of what Birkhäuser was doing before the split.) There is a stalled discussion there to merge Birkhäuser Verlag and ACTAR into ActarBirkhäuser. Tijfo098 (talk) 03:32, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason why ACTAR's Birkhäuser Verlag has a Wikipedia article is that their PR took over the Wikipeida one [1]. The original [2] (presumably written by Springer's PR before the 2010 sale of the architecture part) was closer to the truth. Tijfo098 (talk) 03:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Birkhäuser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]