Talk:Birmingham Royal Institution for the Blind

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed merge with Focus Birmingham[edit]

Focus Birmingham is very closely related to this article, and does not itself merit a stand-alone article. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 16:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree, sorry TYelliott! The institution brib [as it annoyingly abbreviates itself] dates back to 1848, on its current site since the early 1900s, while Focus is a comparative upstart, splitting off from brib in 1998. [I'm currently working on a piece on brib for the Summer 2016 Harborne Society "newsletter", based on the PowerPoint show on the brib site.] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Deeson (talkcontribs) 16:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Closing proposal, given lack of support over 2.5 years and presence of opposition to the merge. Klbrain (talk) 19:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Birmingham Royal Institution for the Blind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]