Jump to content

Talk:Bishop of Lichfield

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redundancy

[edit]

The article Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield contains a listing which is repeated here, formatted differently and without the corrections made in the other article. I propose that Bishop of Lichfield link to the list at Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield list rather than repeating it, but I'd like folks to have a chance to discuss the formatting before I get too bold. --Dystopos 20:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


It would make more sense to make "Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield" link to this list, rather than the other way around, as "Bishop of Lichfield" is both the earliest designation; and also the current designation.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bishop of Lichfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]