Talk:Biutiful

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Mexican cinema task force.

Mexico Mid‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Critical Reception[edit]

Someone please rewrite this - it is PR garbage. 74.191.67.11 (talk) 17:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I revised the section using Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic per WP:RTMC. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office[edit]

What in the world do "domestic" and "overseas" mean in referring to a Spanish-Mexican co-production? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobylub (talk • contribs) 14:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Chinese"[edit]

Chinese is a written language, not a spoken one. Which language is spoken?
Varlaam (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary includes exterior discussion of film's themes[edit]

I noticed in the ending of the plot summary, the paragraph delves off into critical and public interpretations of the film's final scene. Should this be removed? If I remember correctly plot summaries are only supposed to discuss what happens in the film, and not invite these public discussions in this certain section.
WhenKnightFalls (talk)

Supernatural elements[edit]

Given that the protagonist's supernatural powers play a big part in the story, shouldn't the film be categorized as "supernatural drama"? (Alternatively, "magic realist drama"?) It'd help the reader to immediately know that it's a film set within a universe where the supernatural is real. Kumagoro-42 07:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumagoro-42 (talk • contribs)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Biutiful. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Biutiful. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.goldenglobes.org/nominations/year/2010/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101030160849/http://phoenixfilmcriticssociety.org/annual-awards to http://phoenixfilmcriticssociety.org/annual-awards

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]