Talk:Bjarke Ingels

Bjarke Ingels has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 20, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bjarke Ingels or BIG?[edit]

I have read with interest this informative article on Bjarke Ingels but there seems to be some confustion, particularly in regard to projects and awards, as to whether this is really about the individual or rather about the achievements of the firm he founded and which now has a team of over 80. Indeed, careful investigation into some of the work would seem to indicate that other architects were in fact the designers or prizewinners. An easy solution would be to write a separate article on the firm but, failing this, I think it is important to ensure the desgin work and the awards are truly those of Ingels himself. Ipigott (talk) 17:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also have read this article and declare being impressed and inspired by Ingels' accomplishments in such a short time period. I feel there is no need to clear the air on "his" or "his firm's" accomplishments. Its truly a non issue do to the fact he "owned the firm" and all (at least in part with his partner) the firm produced. Unless there exists gross contradiction, the article should not be edited by any large measure. Further, as a young entrepreneur practicing architecture myself, I see this as inspiration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.73.154 (talk) 04:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Got to agree with Ipigott here. The article seems to be almost entirely about BIG and not much about Ingels himself. The information about Ingels is not cited to independent, reliable sources. In effect, I would suggest the article should be about BIG. If Ingels has design partners in his practice then the projects probably aren't attributed to him only. If they are attributed to him, we'd need to see the proof. As an individual, he's barely notable, IMO. Sionk (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, there is already an article about BIG, so there is not need to repeat the information twice. Sionk (talk) 09:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, most of this information belongs in the BIG article.842U (talk) 10:32, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WSJ. resource[edit]

Building a Better Future October 28, 2011. 141.218.36.43 (talk) 22:33, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excerpt ...

According to Ingels, "sustainability" and "green" architecture have for too long been associated with cold showers and turning off the lights when you leave a room. But hedonism is too strong a human impulse, he believes. Shunning "the Protestant idea that it has to hurt to do good," Ingels thinks that buildings can address environmental concerns and still be beautiful, perplexing, comfortable, ironic, joyful and fun. Urban tower blocks don't have to be crammed with dreary rectangles. They can have courtyard gardens and submarine-like periscopes, and still be cost-effective.

99.181.134.134 (talk) 06:04, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bjarke Ingels/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 15:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Remove "Copenhagen" from the lead in the brackets.

I don't know who made that up but I disagree with it. Date of birth and place of birth should be standard practice.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraph 1 of the lead is a bit short. Any chance of merging another paragraph to it?
Ref 54 needs a publisher
Ref 55 needs a publisher
Ref 83 needs a publisher and accessdate
"... at the Office of Metropolitan Architecture in Rotterdam" -> "... at the Office for Metropolitan Architecture in Rotterdam"

All points addressed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Elekhh

Just having a quick look at this, the article has developed very nicely so now is comprehensive and well structured. I find it relies a bit too much on magazines rather than reputable architecture critics, but is ok for GA. The Architectural Review quote is probably the most insightful.

I'd agree with you on sources normally but having researched quite a lot into this I can honestly say that the bulk of the material appears to be in architecture magazines and websites. Very few books document him in the sort of detail we need, its magazines and newspapers which contain the real goods, which I think is fine at least for GA as you say and shouldn't really be a problem at FA given that there are not a massive number of books with details and it would likely be pretty comprehensive should we ever go that far.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of minor issues:

Primary units should be consistently used, and as the vast majority of his projects are in countries using the metric system, it should be metric first. Certainly so for his Danish projects. Probably worth abbreviating, is quite tiresome to go each time through the "xx,xxx square metres (x,xxx,xxx sqare feet)" format.

Agreed, done.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:21, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"in February 2012 Ingels was invited by British Prime Minister David Cameron to a discussion in 10 Downing Street on urban design and safer cycling" - not sure how is this relevant and notable if we don't know of any outcome, and does not help the encyclopaedia entry stay concise.

Removed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:21, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this is of assistance. --ELEKHH^T 00:11, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This looks good to pass now. Thank you Elekhh for also commenting.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Passed; good job! Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:25, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.designbuild-network.com/projects/danish-maritime-muse/
Triggered by \bdesignbuild-network\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 12:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 21:34, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bjarke Ingels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Bjarke Ingels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"a continuation of the colonialist project"[edit]

Bjarke Ingels' Masterplanet vision for Earth is "a continuation of the colonialist project" says Liam Young: [1] Thriley (talk) 05:09, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infrastruktur over eks .struktur[edit]

Over eks motorveje kan der umiddelbart uden andre godkendelser end Folketingets anlægges solfangere horisontale vindm. Varmepumper mm Et rigtigt design af dette kan løse lokalforsyninger her og nu Mvh Jan nordal 178.155.221.132 (talk) 19:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]