Talk:Black Arrow/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will review this article, having already checked that it does not meet the quick-fail criteria. Colds7ream (talk) 16:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Flows nicely as prose, but for future reference could benefit from a longer lead section.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Article is very well-referenced.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Describes the various aspects of the project well.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- Article seems stable, with no ongoing conflicts.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- A good selection of images with concise summaries.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A great article, best of luck with it! :-) Colds7ream (talk) 18:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: