Talk:Blessy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Temp replacement created. Kappa 08:00, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Untitled[edit]

This article sounds somewhat like an unsolicited recommendation.Michaelbusch 16:51, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed many of the above issues - added image. Removed the lines which made it look like a fan-boy's dedication to his idol, fixed grammar and rearranged content. Anand Pillai 03:30, 23 October 2007 (IST)

Blessey's films are critically acclaimed. Hence a fan adjudged, detailed Box office results is not well suited to the article - Xavier —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xavierakx (talkcontribs) 20:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag[edit]

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag. That's my standard paste - since I also see nothing POV here, I'm removing the tag. It may be replaced and commented if anyone has cause.Jjdon (talk) 21:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blessy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]