Talk:Block matrix pseudoinverse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Block matrix pseudoinverse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved here from article section Row-wise partitioning in under-determined least squares[edit]

[Comment re. below: According to section "Derivation" above this method of calculating [A, B]+ for m>=n+p. Can it then be used for an underdetermined system where by definition m (size of x and equal to number of variables) > n+p (number of equations)?]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Loraof (talkcontribs) 21:40, 21 Februrary 2018 (UTC)

Reference for overdetermined?=[edit]

I don't think the reference cited covers the overdetermined case? Or am I missing something simple? Billlion (talk) 22:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I think it was my misunderstanding, I meant row wise and overdetermined. That is not in this article and I cant find similar results for that in the literature. Billlion (talk) 10:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge this stub with Woodbury Matrix Identity[edit]

An entire article from one case-study? Probably should be filed and submerged under Woodbury matrix identity or a similar super-topic in Linear Algebra. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.93.68.165 (talk) 19:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]