Talk:Blood Drive (The Office)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Well-written
- Good summary; I did see this episode. I made a few copyedits myself. My only problem is going too far in the cultural references. Mentioning natural selection isn't exactly cultural, and it definitely should not be explained in another whole sentence; just the link is fine. The same is for Minesweeper, just give a link. I see someone else commented the same thing on the talk page. You also overuse the phrase "a reference to".
- Referenced
- Very good.
- Neutral
- Yes
- Stable
- Yes
- Images
- Good.
Great article overall! I will pass when the above is addressed. Reywas92Talk 17:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- I toned down the section a bit, let me know if you think it's sufficient. Thanks for the review! — Hunter Kahn (c) 22:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't mind even a little less, but it's good. Passing GA, and I hope to see you again.
Great! Reywas92Talk 23:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't mind even a little less, but it's good. Passing GA, and I hope to see you again.
- I toned down the section a bit, let me know if you think it's sufficient. Thanks for the review! — Hunter Kahn (c) 22:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
