Talk:Blooming (geometry)

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Polyhedra

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polyhedra, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of polygons, polyhedra, and other polytopes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolyhedraWikipedia:WikiProject PolyhedraTemplate:WikiProject PolyhedraPolyhedra articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Commons category

@David Eppstein: Does this article actually match commons:Category:Animated polyhedral nets? I thought it was about a subclass of them that are specifically showing 'blooming', in which case the link is misplaced (probably a new Commons category should be created). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All but one of the animated polyhedral nets in that category and in its subcategory show the net animated to move from polyhedron to flat ("blooming"). (Two of them are for other dimensions but still show blooming in those dimensions). The one exception is File:N角柱展開圖.gif where the animation shows a sequence of different nets for different polyhedra rather than the motion of a single net. Perhaps that exception should be moved to a different category? —David Eppstein (talk) 19:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I created commons:Category:Blooming (geometry) to match this article. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rating

@David Eppstein: Trying to reduce the number of unassessed articles in this project. Is this rating accurate?