Jump to content

Talk:Blue Hole (New Jersey)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed Deletion

[edit]

I have, with great sadness, added a ProD to this article. I'd like to see it salvaged, but in its current form it is self-contradictory and unreferenced. There may be a source, if someone can get a copy of:

  • Moran, Mark and Mark Sceurman (2004). Weird N.J. Barnes & Noble. ISBN 0-7607-3979-X..

/Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind

[edit]

Thanks to google books, I've found a few sources online. I'll fix the article soonest. ProD removed. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blue Hole (New Jersey). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates in article are wrong

[edit]

The coordinates given in the article are wrong I just thought someone should know 174.57.137.237 (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]