Jump to content

Talk:Boa imperator

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If it is the smaller subspecies, why was it given the name imperator? Because it is more common (and thus ruling?) 88.159.72.252 (talk) 08:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely no citations in the captivity section. Should I tag each paragraph, or the whole section? -- Resuna (talk) 14:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Boa constrictor imperator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boa constrictor imperator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References citations

[edit]

Hello friends, reference citation 10 http://www.riobravoreptiles.com/care_raisingboas.htm is a deadlink or expired. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avidiwiki (talkcontribs) 23:07, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Common name?

[edit]

It is stated in the article for Boa constrictor that that is the only extant vertebrate species which has a common name that is the same common name as its scientific binomial. And yet here we are at one of its closest relatives presenting the same situation. No doubt some of the confusion arises because of the reletively recent recognition of this as a separate species. There are a number of vernacular names offered, but no clarity as to which should be considered the main name. Is there a reptile equivalent of the IOC World Bird List that gives preferred English language names for each species? Is there any name other than the binomial acknowledged to be the most common? Kevin McE (talk) 00:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]