Talk:Bob's Burgers/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kww (talk · contribs) 23:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Lead section[edit]
Fails to summarize article.
- April 7, 2011 data only in lead, not contained in article.
- "Human Flesh" viewership only in lead, not contained in article.
- Mention of "59th" place violates WP:NUMERO, not mentioned in article, and contains an irrelevant comparison to other series.
Plot[edit]
This section says very little about the plot.
Original pilot[edit]
One massive mispunctuated run-on sentence.
Executive Producers[edit]
Another mispunctuated run-on sentence.
Writing[edit]
Unsourced.
Setting[edit]
Unsourced.
Themes[edit]
Probably beyond obvious. I'd say "unsourced", but my real objection is that if this is all that can be said, there's no use saying anything.
Home media[edit]
Run-on sentence.
Success[edit]
Hopelessly biased. It says that most reviews were mixed, and then proceeds to list only positive comments.
Awards and nominations[edit]
Another WP:NUMERO violation.
Criticism and controversy[edit]
No controversy to be found here, but it does seem to have all the negative parts of those mixed reviews. Fold it together with "Success", and call it "Reception".
International broadcast[edit]
Kill the flags, per MOS:ICON.
Merchandise[edit]
Another massive run-on sentence.
The following sections have been fixed:
- International broadcast, the flags have been removed
- Original pilot, the section is no longer a run-on sentence
- Comment - This article is no where near where it needs to be for a GA. Most of the references are bare links to sites and a good chunk of the prose is completely unsourced. Consider this was a former GA that got demoted, this needs a bit of work to pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- Failing; still unsourced sections after a month. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 12:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)