Talk:Bobby Flynn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

new article to be added[edit]

http://www.smh.com.au/news/tv--radio/fallen-idol-no-loser-fans-say/2006/10/17/1160850931435.html This may (or may not) be useful as a support reference.

controversially?[edit]

What was controversial about Bobby's elimination? He got eliminated exactly the same way anyone else did —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.22.50 (talkcontribs)

I agree, and I've removed the word. Cnwb 11:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"surprise" elimination?

YouTube links[edit]

This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uh How?[edit]

Bobby left the program, amidst considerable public support How do you have considerable public support when you're eliminated from a show that's voted for by the public....

"Considerable support" doesn't necessarily imply that you have the most votes. 203.221.18.140 14:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding non factual rubbish to this[edit]

Can people stop reverting changes saying he was controversially eliminated or admist public support, Idol is a popularity show so he wouldn't have been eliminated had he had public support. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 149.167.29.99 (talk) 03:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Firstly, the voting mechanism for the Idol franchise is hardly unbiased, as voters are able to vote as many times as they like (or can afford). Secondly, there are consequences of the elimination process that mean that the order of eliminations affects the score. In this case, when Lavina Williams was eliminated, all those preferring the Diva style would be likely to have switched their votes to Jessica Mauboy. In contrast, had Lisa Mitchell or Chris Murphy gone earlier, then Bobby Flynn's vote would have probably increased. Who knows how much support Bobby Flynn has out there in the general population? I don't, and frankly you don't either. Best thing to say is that he is widely believed to have great public support, and then quote newspaper references.Yowie 13:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That maybe the case but were is the controversy as it stated previously? and Bobby's fans could of likewise of been sending hordes of sms's, you can't have it both ways.

Could have, not could of, you complete spastic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.183.101.130 (talk) 01:46, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bobby Flynn/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article is libellous and derogatory, it has been written in callous disrespect to the person whom it refers and should be removed immediately and consequences for the writer as are fit in line with Wiki policy should be given serious consideration. Sincerely M. Clifford Brisbane.

Last edited at 12:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 09:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bobby Flynn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bobby Flynn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]