Talk:Bochner space

Wrong definition?

Isn't it required to take equivalence classes of functions which coincide almost everywhere? ASlateff 128.131.37.74 10:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Technically speaking, yes, it is. The usual abuse of notation (identifying an L^p "function" with its equivalence class) is in play here, as it is in Evans' book. Sullivan.t.j 13:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing reference

Maybe it will be more clear if there are some specific reference to which definition of the Evans' book we are talking about 131.114.63.2 (talk) 11:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

edit, there isn't enough material in Evans' book about bochner spaces M.carotta (talk) 11:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]