Talk:Body checking

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force.

Question to contributors

Cheyene.C Joephie Iulia21CristianaS Tahrimmhm Die wahre Pelle: Sandbox drafts are not visible to a search within Wikipedia. Specifically, a search on "Body checking" does not yield this draft. However, viewing the history of edits to the draft shows that eight editors are aware of this draft and have edited only this draft. This suggests either a group effort (allowed) or one person using multiple accounts (forbidden). Could one of the editors reply here, explaining the situation? David notMD (talk) 08:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. My interest is procedural. I have no knowledge of the topic, and am not a reviewer or an Administrator. David notMD (talk) 08:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is a group assignment in what students wrote together this article as part of a course at Maastricht University. Romaine (talk) 13:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Good article but i think its better to cite scientific article and not blog post. It could be useful for improving the text to correctly cite exiting literature about the topic. Maybe using pubmed and search for reviews (as wikipedia request) or peer-reviewed paper. Srobodao84 (talk) 14:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia..

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 22:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]