There are unsourced statements in this article. As the nominator is blocked for 3 months with no successful appeal likely, I will be quickfailing this article. --Rschen7754 23:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see just 2 cite needed tags and no other uncited text. Those can be cited in a couple days or removed if given a chance... -Fnlayson (talk) 23:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There were other issues mentioned on the article's talk page as well. --Rschen7754 23:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think the article is generally at or close to GA standards. But there's enough referencing, formatting of referencing, and some copy editing to not be done in a few days. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
