Talk:Boeing Passenger Air Vehicle

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Two articles about the same subject[edit]

The same person created two different articles with different lemmata, knowing exactly whath he does. What's the reaeson for it, please explain it. It's against logic and Wikipedia rules and doesn't make sense. Passenger Air Vehicle or PAV isn't a name, but just a term for all vehicles that fly and transport persons. If Boeing NeXt isn't correct, then let's discuss first, instead simply double the text and remove the specifications of the older version. We are working together here, not against each other or at least we should. --Leo067 (talk) 06:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, one is about the company, and one is about the aircraft. That's a normal division of subjects on Wikipedia. Titles can be changed if necessary. - BilCat (talk) 07:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article and lemma Boeing NeXt is not about the company, but just a department of it. It's the development department of the company Boeing, which primarily focuses on the design with the conception of aircrafts in the field of Urban Air Mobility. Now there is a lot of data with primary links in the article now (direct data from Boeing). As far as I know, it's important for Wikipedia and a rule only to use secondary sources to get the information. The reason is clear. The old version did use those kind of links, so it could be exchanged easily. --Leo067 (talk) 11:46, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]