Talk:Bohemia Interactive/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheSandDoctor (talk · contribs) 20:34, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Bohemia Interactive? They develop one of my favourite video games, ArmA 3 - will definitely review this. Stand by. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:34, 8 August 2017 (UTC) "The team also bought a T-72 tank in order to express gratitude" - there is no problem with this line, I just thought I would bring it up as it really seems bizarre. I would seriously recommend nominating this article for DYK once it is approved and having that as a suggested hook - seriously.

• "Operation Flashpoint: Cold War Crisis by Codemasters to critical acclaim." - source?
• "selling more than 500,000 copies in its first three months of release, as well as reaching a top position in retail sales chart across the world including US, UK, Germany and Australia." - source?
• "eam intended to continue updating the game with post-release content, develop a port for the Xbox console, and create a sequel. " - reference?
• "Projected to take only nine months to develop" - source? I read through the reference at the end of the sentence, but it makes no reference to the nine month projection mentioned in this article, did you mean to have this reference there instead of the current one or?
• "A Xbox 360 version was planned but was later scrapped after the team thought that its power was inferior to that of personal computers." - I think this needs a reference closer to it
• "... Czech President Václav Klaus urging the Greek President to solve this issue with "special attention". - source?
• "...ARMA 2 and ARMA 3, both of which have been critically acclaimed and financially sustainable." - I think this needs a source closer to it
• " This helps to increase the longevity of their games significantly and keep the player base engaged in their games for an extended period of time." - source?

That's all - I really like what has been done with this article so far and think that, with these changes, the article will pass GA and would even recommend inquiring about FA. The majority of the above concerns revolve around bringing citations already present closer (as mentioned in some of the above), but there are also some where the citations given do not match the content (might have been put backwards as I found it further down in different area?).

@AdrianGamer: Until these issues are addressed, I am placing this nomination  On hold. I realize that you may not be back yet from your vacation so, as with Rainbow 6 siege, I am happy to wait or have these go through one at a time (I am in no hurry). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 21:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

@TheSandDoctor: - Thanks for the review and your patience! I have fixed all the issues you have mentioned above and removed the ones I can't fix. AdrianGamer (talk) 09:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

I am happy with the fixes that have been implemented at this point, I am happy to re-promote this article. Well done AdrianGamer! Have you considered DYK by any chance? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

I used to nominate lots of my articles for DYK but I lose my interest doing so a year ago. I didn't mind others nominate it though. AdrianGamer (talk) 04:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Do you mind if I nominate it then AdrianGamer? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 15:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I am definitely ok with that. AdrianGamer (talk) 11:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks AdrianGamer! I have nominated it for DYK (see here). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)