Talk:Bohemond III of Antioch

Bohemond III of Antioch has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 21, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Middle Ages: Crusades Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Corinne, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 19 August 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

A fact from Bohemond III of Antioch appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the third wife of Bohemond III of Antioch was described as a witch by William of Tyre, and as a whore by Michael the Syrian?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bohemond III of Antioch.

Wikipedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bohemond III of Antioch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BlackJack (talk · contribs) 14:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review[edit]

I'll commence this review shortly. Jack | ^{talk page} 14:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checking for immediate failure conditions[edit]

WP:WIAGA#Immediate_failures states that an article can, but by no means must, be failed without further review (known as "quick failing") if, prior to the review:

it is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria:
it contains copyright infringements:
it has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid — e.g., {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}}:
the article is not stable due to edit warring on the page:

As the article has not failed any one of the above four tests, a full review will follow. Jack | ^{talk page} 15:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full review criteria checks[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for the six good article criteria:

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable with no original research?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Inline citations to reliable sources where necessary (e.g., direct quotations):

C. No original research:

D. No copyright violations:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

Reports[edit]

There is no reason for immediate failure. I have added the GA criteria above and will check each of these as part of the detailed review to commence soon. Thanks. Jack | ^{talk page} 15:05, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've reviewed this in detail now and it's an informative, well-written and well-presented piece of work. The only little criticism I had, which I've resolved myself, was that there were several redlinks. I've removed those links but you can always relink them if and when the relevant articles are created. As you can see from the checklist above, I can't see any problems (e.g., images, neutrality, citations) and it passes all criteria. I'm closing the review now with GA=pass. Well done. Jack | ^{talk page} 14:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BlackJack, thank you for your review and your kind words. Have a nice day. Borsoka (talk) 03:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Armoiries Albret.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]