Talk:Bongard problem

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Robotics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Solutions?[edit]

I can't seem to find solutions to the Bongard problems anywhere on the internet. Does anyone know where they can be found? --AndreRD (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are they?[edit]

Shouldn't there be an example, or at least description, as to what the Bongard problems actually are? I came here through an AI wiki page, hoping to find out what that page was talking about, but I'm no wiser now =/ /85.229.218.38 (talk) 04:47, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the same way. This article uses almost 200 words to explain nothing. An example would help a lot. I'd add one, but I still have no clue what a Bongard problem is! 212.51.139.102 (talk) 21:04, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to all the Bongard Problems: http://www.foundalis.com/res/bps/bpidx.htm (20040302 (talk) 08:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

These are often used in the Abstract Reasoning section of University Clinical Aptitude Tests and similar.

Most peculiar bibliography note[edit]

Quote:

Foundalis left the field in 2008 due to ethical concerns regarding machines that can pass as human, and restarted in 2011 having considered that human suicide bombers are already here anyway.

His musings http://www.foundalis.com/soc/why_no_more_Bongard.html read pretty infantile, ethics wise. -> let us remove it. Zezen (talk) 08:33, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In popular culture[edit]

Create the section and moved the last line of the overview here Theking2 (talk) 15:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]