Jump to content

Talk:Bouguer anomaly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is the geological interpretation of Bouger anomalies?

[edit]

I think this article could use a section about the geological significance of the bouger anomaly. Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 19:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • The lead at the moment is hardly useful - why is it called an anomaly? I understand from other sources that it is related to assumptions of the shape and density of the earth but someone who understand geology needs to explain this with diagrams/illustrations of how height and low or high density in the subsurface translates to the anomalous gravitometric readings. Shyamal (talk) 11:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bouguer anomaly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Anomaly: Cartesian Coordinate z

[edit]

The text states

"More generally, for a mass distribution with the density depending on one Cartesian coordinate z only, gravity for any z is 2πG times the difference in mass per unit area on either side of this z value."

However, no explanation is given for this z axis. Is this perpendicular to the plane? Or is it parallel to the plane? Can someone with knowledge please elaborate? Thank you. LRDodd (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]