Talk:Box battery

Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase II)

This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 13 February 2024. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citing your sources.

First days of gunpowder artillery at sea[edit]

Are we certain about black powder artillery being carried on broadside aboard warship from the very first days of it being used at sea? Did galleys in the Mediterranean, armed with cannon and swivel guns in varying mixtures, not tend to carry the heavier pieces at the bow? This would constitute a bow battery, not broadside arrangement, surely? Even given that lighter swivel guns were mounted along the rails above the thwarts?

It was my understanding that oared warships (a type in common use at the start of the medieval period) only really adopted broadside batteries of heavier ordnance for anti-ship work with the advent of the Renaissance galleass. Were heavily broadside-armed sailing vessels already in use much before this? what was the state of armament of ships like caravels at the time? Had these or Naos/carracks yet appeared when the galley to galleass development was occurring?

In short, can we be absolutely certain that our opening is correct and not unintentionally erroneous or misleading?

Edit: Wiki's article on 'Galley' contains the line "They were the first ships to effectively use heavy cannons as anti-ship weapons", which seems to be a strong claim in the other direction to this article's assertion. Where do we stand on this? 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:3063:2CFA:2CBB:6B4C (talk) 00:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]