Talk:Boy (dog)
Appearance
A fact from Boy (dog) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Untitled
[edit]A basic page for Boye established. Around half the writers seem to call him 'Boye', the other half 'Boy' - I've gone for the former as the number of references just seemed to edge in that direction. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Deletion of image
[edit]Just noticed that User:Tuckerresearch deleted one of the images from the article - there was no comment made in the edit summary as to why, however. Was there any particular reason for it to be removed? Hchc2009 (talk) 07:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm going to undo the deletion for now, but obviously if there's a good reason for removing it, let's do so.Hchc2009 (talk) 07:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, I removed it because it superfluous. Why don't you add a picture of a dachshund and say "A 21st century representation of a non-contemporary dachshund"? TuckerResearch (talk) 02:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Mainly because modern poodles look rather different to 17th century ones; personally, I couldn't work out why the "lapland lady" simile worked for the 17th century audience until I saw this woodcut. There is a reference somewhere out there that suggests the original picture, on which this subsequent woodcut was based, was actually of Rupert's dog - but since I can't find what I did with the reference this doesn't help my case any! Hchc2009 (talk) 10:01, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yet we have two contemporary renderings of the poodle in question, I think the third, which is NOT Boye is excessive. However, I don't really care either. TuckerResearch (talk) 21:16, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Mainly because modern poodles look rather different to 17th century ones; personally, I couldn't work out why the "lapland lady" simile worked for the 17th century audience until I saw this woodcut. There is a reference somewhere out there that suggests the original picture, on which this subsequent woodcut was based, was actually of Rupert's dog - but since I can't find what I did with the reference this doesn't help my case any! Hchc2009 (talk) 10:01, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, I removed it because it superfluous. Why don't you add a picture of a dachshund and say "A 21st century representation of a non-contemporary dachshund"? TuckerResearch (talk) 02:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class Dogs articles
- Low-importance Dogs articles
- Dogs Did you know articles
- WikiProject Dogs articles
- C-Class Occult articles
- Low-importance Occult articles
- WikiProject Occult articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- C-Class Wars of the Three Kingdoms articles
- Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force articles