Talk:Boyhood

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

On 15 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Boyhood (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 25 March 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per consensus, and note that things being named for a sense is not part of the primary topic criteria. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boyhood (disambiguation) → Boyhood – I doubt that someone who wants to find an article about boys will type "boyhood". Georgia guy (talk) 19:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. No clear primary topic for this term; Move disambiguation page to basename. I'd wait a while before considering a possible move to make the film the primary topic, since primary topic swaps are often a bit awkward. Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - easy enough for editors to use [[boy]]hood linking method if the need arises. -- Netoholic @ 21:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Move Boyhood (film) to Boyhood as the WP:primary topic. The film gets well over triple the pageviews of Boy and over 100 times the pageviews of the novel or Boyhood (disambiguation). The dab page can then stay where it is. Station1 (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'd strongly oppose this option. No matter the pageviews, the film is named specifically for the everyday term, and that term is the primary topic. While I think we can be fine not needing the WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT, I would much prefer we do nothing than to assign any one article to boyhood. If Station1's option does catch on, you can count my vote as a full oppose any move. -- Netoholic @ 02:10, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The clear primary topic by historical importance is the period in the life of a human male of being a boy. Everything else with this title is named for that sense. While it could be argued that childhood could also be a target for this term, boyhood is not ambiguous to childhood, but is a particular case of childhood. BD2412 T 04:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Paintspot, no primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would also note that this was originally created as a redirect to Childhood, although Boy might be a better target given the views of the film its unlikely to be primary today. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Boyhood (2014 film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Boyhood (2014 film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]