Talk:Brad Mattson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Promotional content[edit]

Much of this article is still too promotional. As just one example, the list of awards lacks WP:SECONDARY sources, and most of the awards lack articles, so there is not enough context to determine what the awards actually signify. The archive.org link for the European magazine award isn't working for me,[1] but even if it worked, there is no simple way to determine what that award signifies. What is this magazine? Does it have an article that explains this? Does it have an editorial board, what's its circulation? Without at least some minimal context, mentioning it merely serves to puff-up the subject of the article without actually providing any meaningful information. Other than the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award, I don't think any of the awards, which are listed in the lead for some reason, have articles. These non-notable awards should be supported by very solid secondary sources before being included. What is the "Ignatian Award"? Even after reading the source, I still don't know, other than that it's an alumni award. I'm sure it looks great in his study, but why is it encyclopedically significant?

The underlying problem is that this article is likely an WP:AUTOBIO or has similar WP:COI problem. It includes obscure, unsourced info, such as the high school graduation and college transfer info, that suggests this was written by someone with first or second-hand information, which is WP:OR, among other things. The article is eager to paint a picture of Mattson as a great man, but this isn't the place for hagiography.

This is a WP:BLP, a biography of a living person, and per BLP policy, unsourced information about a living person must be sourced or removed. The appropriate way to fix these problems is to find sources for all unsourced info. All sources should specifically mention Mattson, exceptions are very rare, otherwise it's WP:SYNTH. If no such source can be found, the info should not be included in the article. Other than routine, uncontroversial biographical details (such as schools attended, birthdates, etc.) factual info should use WP:SECONDARY sources. This means the source is not associated with Mattson, but it also means that using the website of a non-notable award to support the inclusion of the award is inappropriate. For opinions the article needs to clearly explain whose opinion it is. None of this "widely regarded as a visionary in the semiconductor industry and is gaining prominence in the field of solar power" garbage which was supported by one interview in a business book, a passing mention, and press releases by one of Mattson's companies! Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion, and such obviously promotional wording is WP:PEACOCK wording that violate Wikipedia's WP:NPOV guideline. Grayfell (talk) 21:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed most of the awards, and made a number of other changes. The E&Y award was not properly supported, as the press release only said he was a finalist in Norther California in a specific category. I'm satisfied that the article is no longer so promotional that it needs to be tagged. Grayfell (talk) 22:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brad Mattson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]