Talk:Bramham Moor Aerodrome

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bramham Moor Aerodrome article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Bramham Moor Aerodrome is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Biography

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aerospace biography project.

Military history: Aviation / British / European / World War I / World War II / Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

WikiProject Yorkshire[edit]

Please note that I have not assessed the above due to my lack of familiarity with geographic project requirements and ignorance of English topography.Georgejdorner (talk) 03:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested improvements to a well-done B class article[edit]

1) Link the American squadrons. Y

2) Check the linked squadrons for any flying aces or other notable persons. N

Congratulations on a great article. I've been reading/writing about WWI aviation for years, and had never heard of Arab pilots in the RAF. If they were from the Ottoman Empire, they must have been turncoats. There's probably a heck of a story behind them.Georgejdorner (talk) 03:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Georgejdorner Thanks for the review. Unfortunately, any possible notable personnel on the Aero Squadrons are either non-wikinotable, or their details about their service life do not include any mention of Bramham, Bramham Moor, or Tadcaster. The Arab pilots piece is supported by only one, albeit reliable, reference. The only other way to cross-check would be to consult the PRO at Kew, but the pandemic was against me on that, and I would need a secondary source. Anything I found out for myself would have been WP:OR. So there may not be too much mileage in it. Thanks for the kind words and happy editing. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 07:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I knew the recommendations were chancy, and so they did not work out. It's great you took the effort to follow up on them.Georgejdorner (talk) 16:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]