Talk:Breath gas analysis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Breath gas analysis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Molecular Biology: COMPBIO

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

[edit]

The article http://www.esi.ac.at/~susanne/FFOeFH2011_KUTK.pdf was written by me. How is it possible to commit a copyright infringement when I use my own material?

Do the other authors listed there approve of the fact that you are releasing it under a free license that allows anyone to use it for any purpose then? かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 16:28, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, actually they have asked me to start an article on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlunterkofler (talk • contribs) 16:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see wp:donating copyrighted materials. Simply claiming permission is never enough. Hairhorn (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I inserted this few sentences now as a correct citation from that article. It makes no sense to me to rewrite the same content with a slightly other formulation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlunterkofler (talk • contribs) 18:40, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting an entire block of text is not the same thing as a citation, there is no clear need for a block quote. Placing quotation marks around text is not a replacement for going through proper copyright channels. Hairhorn (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The whole block has been rewritten. It seems to me that only a small part of one sentence is close to the orignal text. I have added again the reference to document the fact where this is coming from. I do not see a problem any more, in particular since the author of this part is also an author of the reference. --Shop lifters of the world unite (talk) 21:12, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There was plenty left, including the block quote. I have tried to rewrite or remove what I could find. If the author wants to donate copyright, he or she can send permission through OTRS, it's never enough to simply claim ownership on the talk page, since anyone can do that. Also, the block of text was from a different article, not the one this editor claims to have written. Hairhorn (talk) 00:50, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We have released the above article under a creative common license (as indicated in the above pdf on the first page). So I presume it should be possible to use the material. So how to proceed? Thanks for your help. --Karlunterkofler (talk) 19:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I missed the license before; it wouldn't apply to the large blockquote, however, since that's from another paper. The text needs attribution on the entry page, perhaps someone knows the proper template. I've removed the copypaste tag for now. Hairhorn (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that the original quote was OK. However, it is probably better to not have a section with just one quote. I have added the connection to the ancient greeks and think this part should be fine now. --Shop lifters of the world unite (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Breath gas analysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.esi.ac.at/~susanne/FFOeFH2011_KUTK.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110818055652/http://iabr.voc-research.at/ to http://iabr.voc-research.at/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link to article on Chemical sensor array[edit]

I have just added a link to the Wikipedia page on Chemical sensor array. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nanomaterials21 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please merge the three articles into one[edit]

Why are Breath test, Breath diagnostics and this article separate? They should be merged. Kerubis (talk) 21:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]