Talk:Breusch–Godfrey test

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Formulas seem to be broken is last version[edit]

All the formulas seem to be broken in the last version. Tried to fix it but no success. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.92.76.38 (talk) 16:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too technical for most readers to understand?[edit]

This article has been tagged as being too technical for most readers to understand since April of 2008. I am going through all of the articles so tagged and trying to fix them if I can and seeking help where I can't. Please point out any specific areas where we can improve the article to make it more understandable.

An alternative would be to arrive at a consensus that the article is fine the way it is, in which case I will remove the tag. I am considering doing exactly that if nobody objects in the next seven days. Guy Macon 05:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There were many additions since the tag was placed in April of 2008. I have now added a (hopefully suitable) non-technical lead. This, together with the earlier changes, might be enough. Melcombe (talk) 13:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks really good to me. Good work. I am going to wait seven days to see if anyone disagrees and then, if not, I will delete the tags. Guy Macon 13:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tag removed. Guymacon (talk) 07:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

H1[edit]

What is H1 hypothesis in Breusch–Godfrey test? (H0 is clearly given in the article)
Is Breusch–Godfrey Chi-square test is one sided or two sided test?

I think the above two must also be given in the article. I needed and do not know these two for example. Any help will be appreciated. 212.174.38.3 (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Auxiliary Regression[edit]

On 9/24, I changed the $\widehat{Y}_{t}$ on the left-hand side of the regression equation to $\widehat{u}_{t}$ on the left-hand side of the regression equation. The auxiliary regression's dependent variables are the residuals from the initial regression of the dependent variable Y against the independent variables. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.202.182.120 (talk) 23:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]