Talk:Brian Halligan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleBrian Halligan was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 11, 2011Good article nomineeListed
December 20, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
January 23, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 24, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 9, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Brian Halligan, an executive and author, draws inspiration for marketing from the rock band the Grateful Dead?
Current status: Delisted good article

Dead links[edit]

Hello, this is one of my first talks, so I wanted to point out (if it's been missed by others) that sources 7 and 8 are dead links. I caught this when I noticed the referenced sentence was missing his second title at Groove Networks (it said "...as vice president of sales and, " -- so I tried clicking on the links to identify what the additional title should be. Since I'm new, can someone let me know what we do in a situation like this? Do we just delete the link or try to find a replacement link? Thank you much!GreeneTwiki (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

Brian Halligan[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delist per consensus ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A GA from 2011 that does not meet current standards. It has a heavy reliance on primary and non-independent sources, which may also be WP:SPS. The prose also has an odd mix of promotional tone and critical tone, rather than integrating all information in a more WP:NPOV appropriate style. CMD (talk) 12:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the independent sources are related to the Daniel Lyons business, while most of the core bio uses non-independent sources. Wondering why there is not an article on the book, with that content covered there. Also considering the history of COI/socking at this article, the bio seems unlikely to be brought to GA status, and delisting is probably the best course (along with more eyes going forward). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, sourcing is quite poor. Hog Farm Talk 18:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.